[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Rollei] OT: Nice image but bad bokeh -- look!
- Subject: RE: [Rollei] OT: Nice image but bad bokeh -- look!
- From: "gary widland" <gwidland >
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 22:44:13 +0000
- References:
<html><div style='background-color:'><DIV>
<P>Gary Widland here, new member, been watching all this, and didn't even understand "bokeh." Now I realize, and for this shot I have to say Bokeh Schmokay. I agree with Peter. In a moment, this photo captures an essence. A great shot that tells a huge story. <BR><BR></P></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>----Original Message Follows----
<DIV></DIV>From: "Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)" <PETERK >
<DIV></DIV>Reply-To: rollei
<DIV></DIV>To: <ROLLEI
<DIV></DIV>Subject: RE: [Rollei] OT: Nice image but bad bokeh -- look!
<DIV></DIV>Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 14:28:05 -0700
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>Two comments. First, the only people who complained about boek are
<DIV></DIV>those on the RUG. No comments were noted as such on the comments
<DIV></DIV>associated with the photograph.
<DIV></DIV>Secondly, it it hard to eliminate those harsh shadows where lighting is
<DIV></DIV>so bright in the background regardless of lens. I would almost bet you
<DIV></DIV>the photographer used an aperture of about F5.6 considering the depth of
<DIV></DIV>field and lens.
<DIV></DIV>If a wider aperture it would lose the selective focus including the
<DIV></DIV>motorcycle but your bokeh would have been better. Given a choice, I
<DIV></DIV>think the photographer did very well. It is always easy to judge for
<DIV></DIV>those that have a hard time doing.
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>Peter K
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>
<DIV></DIV>http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=1520408
<DIV></DIV></div><br clear=all><hr>STOP MORE SPAM with <a href="http://g.msn.com/8HMBENUS/2728??PS=";>the new MSN 8</a> and get 2 months FREE*</html>
------------------------------