[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Rollei] OT A drop in speed of Delta 3200
- Subject: RE: [Rollei] OT A drop in speed of Delta 3200
- From: "Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)" <peterk >
- Date: Fri, 30 May 2003 10:40:31 -0700
- References:
Nathan,
To you shoot the Neopan at the rated speed?
Peter K
- -----Original Message-----
From: Nathan Wajsman (private) [mailto:nathanw
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 10:16 AM
To: rollei us
Subject: Re: [Rollei] OT A drop in speed of Delta 3200
Rich,
I find Neopan 1600 the best of the high speed films. I rate it at 1600,
develop in XTOL 1+3, and get far better results than with Delta 3200
rated at 1600. I have not used Kodak's version for many years, but my
memories of it are not fond.
Nathan
tripspud wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> Aren't the effective speeds of Neopan 1600, T-Max P3200
> and Delta 1600 rather similar in terms of speed? I'm asking because
> I'd like to know which gives the most effective speed, as you mention,
> in terms of negative shadow detail, given the same developer.
>
> Is there a web site that would compare these three current
> emulsions?
- --
Nathan Wajsman
Herrliberg (ZH), Switzerland
e-mail: nathanw@bluewin.ch
mobile: +41 78 732 1430
Photo-A-Week: http://www.wajsman.com/indexpaw2003.htm
General photo site: http://www.wajsman.com/index.htm
------------------------------