[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Rollei] Re: FS--23 May 03
- Subject: RE: [Rollei] Re: FS--23 May 03
- From: "Dale Dickerson" <vze2g2z8 >
- Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 14:03:53 -0400
I have the 30mm Russian MC and a Kiev 88cm to use it. The contrast is a
bit less then my 50mm Rollei Zeiss HFT coated lens, but very good. The
difference is like comparing an image on Kodak Porta nc 160 using iso
160 vs using iso 80.
I cannot compare my 30mm to the Zeiss version. I owned an early 1990s
Russian 30mm and sold it to buy the newer MC version of the Russian. The
MC is a great improvement over the earlier single coat version. I agree
client do not tell the current 30mm Russian from the Zeiss.
- -----Original Message-----
From: owner-rollei us
[mailto:owner-rollei On Behalf Of Slobodan
Sent: Saturday, May 24, 2003 1:46 PM
To: rollei us
Subject: Re: [Rollei] Re: FS--23 May 03
Distortion is a given, even with my 40mm S/A. But, how's the contrast?
Particularly with B/W.
> The Russian 30mm was outstanding. When you think about what your
> photographing with a 30mm. The only things you can look at are
sharpness and color,
> distortaion??? The Russian on the 2000 FCW held it's own woth the
> I would not be worried showing the photos with it to a client, they
> tell one from the other.
> T. Mike -- And it's still for sale.