[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Rollei] 3.5E species follow-up
- Subject: [Rollei] 3.5E species follow-up
- From: SandersM
- Date: Sat, 24 May 2003 12:29:37 EDT
- References:
- --part1_1e6.97dbcba.2c00f7f1_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Thanks to all who answered my question about the differences between a 3.5E2
and 3.5E3. Vincent Gookin's post, in particular, made several points that
raised additional questions for me, that I hope the list might answer:
1. Vincent mentions that the E3 has a six-element Planar lens. I'm
currently using an original 3.5E, with the five-element Planar. I know this was a
subject of some recent discussion on this list, but is there any discernable
difference in image quality between the two lens designs?
2. Vincent and other respondents mention a flat glass plate option. What
is it, and why would I want it?
3. I gather that the E2 is built on the E body, whilst the E3 is built on
the F body, and both have removeable focusing hoods. If my goal is to have a
3.5E TLR without the meter, is there any reason to prefer the one over the
other as a working camera?
Thanks in advance for your answers and patience.
Sanders McNew
- --part1_1e6.97dbcba.2c00f7f1_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<HTML><FONT FACE=3Darial,helvetica><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" FACE=3D"Geneva" F=
AMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" SIZE=3D"3">Thanks to all who answered my question about=20=
the differences between a 3.5E2 and 3.5E3. Vincent Gookin's post, in=20=
particular, made several points that raised additional questions for me, tha=
t I hope the list might answer:<BR>
<BR>
1. Vincent mentions that the E3 has a six-element Planar lens. =20=
I'm currently using an original 3.5E, with the five-element Planar. =20=
I know this was a subject of some recent discussion on this list, but is the=
re any discernable difference in image quality between the two lens designs?=
<BR>
<BR>
2. Vincent and other respondents mention a flat glass plate option.&n=
bsp; What is it, and why would I want it?<BR>
<BR>
3. I gather that the E2 is built on the E body, whilst the E3 is buil=
t on the F body, and both have removeable focusing hoods. If my goal=20=
is to have a 3.5E TLR without the meter, is there any reason to prefer the o=
ne over the other as a working camera?<BR>
<BR>
Thanks in advance for your answers and patience.<BR>
<BR>
Sanders McNew</FONT><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" FACE=3D"Geneva" FAMILY=3D"SANSSE=
RIF" SIZE=3D"3"></FONT></HTML>
- --part1_1e6.97dbcba.2c00f7f1_boundary--
------------------------------