[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Rollei] Just wondering. . .
- Subject: Re: [Rollei] Just wondering. . .
- From: Pamelajeancurry
- Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 21:05:52 EDT
- References:
- --part1_4e.1c6e8a95.2bf83670_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear Attorney Small:
You apparently read like an Attorney, because this paragraph=20
completely
misrepresents what I've written in four posts.
"And threatening a defamation lawsuit against Jerry Lehrer is simply=20
absurd.
I AM an attorney, and, like you, I am not afraid of NATO, whatever=20
bearing
THAT has on your point.=A0 Be more friendly and accomodating"
The post title read "lawsuit". You failed to comprehend that I=
=20
publicize
my lawsuit in order to make it clear I will not tolerate this behavior=
.=20
Mr. King made a sarcastic reply to my inquiry about a Zeiss=20
lens. I clarified my statement so that he could understand. The baiting=20
belonged to Mr. King and "Jerry" and Bob. I'm sorry you're hobbyist.
Unless it is in a brief, don't ever advise me on how to respond=
=20
to a
potential libel. A "threat" by you for me not to resond to defamation o=
f=20
my work
or my reputation, is by far more actionable than anything Jerry wrote, o=
n
this we agree. =20
The following statements do not follow a policy of "good-will an=
d=20
honest
debate". =20
Pam
If I were a physician, I would suggest that you take a
Prozac and then try to rewrite that message.=A0 Maybe
a tranquilizer too!
The comment "Jerry" made in his note to "bob" indicated that I=
=20
was
not a competent photographer. Sorry, I'm not a hobbyist. That is a form=
=20
of
defamation.
I have an absolute right to inform "Jerry" and now the Group=20
since you
decided to allow this conduct, of those rights in my own defense.
As debate goes, while "Jerry" was being libelous, I gave him=20
the
opportunity to reference information to educate himself on the issue.
Court ordered sensitivity training would not be inappropriate, but=20
would
be extreme. =20
In most of the posts to this group, I've added the link to my=20
website,
where on the very first page you may note, I am an aggressive advocate
against this type of behavior. That would give your members the=20
opportunity
to have "knowledge" that this type of statement was not be received as=
=20
in
"good will". I publicize the fact I was the victim of defamation to=20
makes it=20
clear that I will not fall victim again by non-action =20
=20
As far as "Jerry" is concerned... =20
It appears PacBell is providing service through SBC Yahoo
The following are their terms of agreement:
=20
9. MEMBER CONDUCT=20
You agree that you will NOT use the Service to:
> (a) upload, post, email, transmit or otherwise make available any Content=20
> (as defined below) that is unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive,=20
> harassing, tortious, defamatory, vulgar, obscene, libelous, invasive of=20
> another's privacy, hateful, or racially, ethnically or otherwise=20
> objectionable;=20
>=20
>=20
You will find whores, or other women attorney's perhaps that are
"accommodating" but I do not fall into either of those categories. =20
=20
Sincerely,
Pamela=20
Jean Curry =20
=20
=20
- --part1_4e.1c6e8a95.2bf83670_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<HTML><FONT FACE=3Darial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=3D2 FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" FACE=
=3D"Arial" LANG=3D"0"> Dear Attorney Small:<BR=
>
<BR>
You apparently read l=
ike an Attorney, because this paragraph completely<BR>
misrepresents what I've written in four posts.<BR>
<BR>
"And threatening a defamation lawsuit against Jerry=
Lehrer is simply absurd.<BR>
I AM an attorney, and, like you, I am not afraid of=
NATO, whatever bearing<BR>
THAT has on your point.=A0 Be more friendly and acc=
omodating"<BR>
<BR>
&nbs=
p; The post title read "lawsuit". You failed to comprehend that I publicize<=
BR>
my lawsuit in order to make it clear I will n=
ot tolerate this behavior. <BR>
<BR>
Mr.=
King made a sarcastic reply to my inquiry about a Zeiss lens. I clarified m=
y statement so that he could understand. The baiting belonged to Mr. King an=
d "Jerry" and Bob. I'm sorry you're hobbyist.<BR>
<BR>
Unl=
ess it is in a brief, don't ever advise me on how to respond to a<BR>
potential libel. A "threat" by you for me not to re=
sond to defamation of my work<BR>
or my reputation, is by far more actionable than anything=
Jerry wrote, on<BR>
this we agree. <BR>
<BR>
The follo=
wing statements do not follow a policy of "good-will and honest<BR>
debate". <BR>
&nbs=
p; Pam<BR>
&nbs=
p; If I were a physician, I would suggest that you take a<BR>
&nbs=
p; Prozac and then try to rewrite that message.=A0 Maybe<BR>
&nbs=
p; a tranquilizer too!<BR>
<BR>
&nbs=
p; The comment "Jerry" made in his note to "bob" indicated that I was<BR>
not a competent photographer. Sorry, I'm not a hobb=
yist. That is a form of<BR>
defamation.<BR>
<BR>
&nbs=
p; I have an absolute right to inform "Jerry" and now the Group since you<BR=
>
decided to allow this conduct, of those rights in m=
y own defense.<BR>
<BR>
&nbs=
p; As debate goes, while "Jerry" was being libelous, I gave him the<BR>
opportunity to reference information to educa=
te himself on the issue.<BR>
Court ordered sensitivity training would not=20=
be inappropriate, but would<BR>
be extreme. <BR>
<BR>
&nbs=
p; In most of the posts to this group, I've added the link to my website,<BR=
>
where on the very first page you may note, I=20=
am an aggressive advocate<BR>
against this type of behavior. That wou=
ld give your members the opportunity<BR>
to have "knowledge" that this type of stateme=
nt was not be received as in<BR>
"good will". I publicize the fact=
I was the victim of defamation to makes it <BR>
clear that I will not fall victim again by no=
n-action <BR>
<B> &=
nbsp; <BR>
As far as "Jerry" is concer=
ned... <BR>
<BR>
It appears PacBell is provi=
ding service through SBC Yahoo<BR>
The following are their terms of agreement:<BR>
<BR>
9. MEMBER CONDUCT </B><BR>
<BR>
You agree that you will NOT use the Service to:<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=3DCITE style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT=
: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">(a) upload, post, email, transm=
it or otherwise make available any Content (as defined below) that is unlawf=
ul, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortious, defamatory, vulgar,=20=
obscene, libelous, invasive of another's privacy, hateful, or racially, ethn=
ically or otherwise objectionable; <BR>
<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
You will find whores,=
or other women attorney's perhaps that are<BR>
"accommodating" but I do not fall into either of those ca=
tegories. <BR>
<BR>
&nbs=
p; &n=
bsp; =
&nbs=
p; &n=
bsp; Sincerely,<=
BR>
&nbs=
p; &n=
bsp; =
&nbs=
p; &n=
bsp; Pamela Jean Curry =
&nbs=
p; <BR>
<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
</FONT></HTML>
- --part1_4e.1c6e8a95.2bf83670_boundary--
------------------------------