[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Rollei] Lawsuit from Curiosity: off topic Zeiss lens, Arri
- Subject: Re: [Rollei] Lawsuit from Curiosity: off topic Zeiss lens, Arri
- From: Bob Shell <bob >
- Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 18:10:45 -0400
What is this nonsense doing here? I suggest that Pamela Jean or
whatever his/her real name is should go trolling on a fishing list and
get the hell off this one.
On Saturday, May 17, 2003, at 04:58 PM, Pamelajeancurry wrote:
> You understand there are limitations under U.S. Law on how far
> "opinion" can be expressed before if becomes defamatory. If you
> a "physician", I would take you to the ethics committee of the
> AMA, or
> worse. The public citizen link to one of many articles on Medical
> about New York's most dangerous and undisciplined doctors.
> If anyone has read my lawsuit against the N.Y. Times or the
> of my website (where I've reviewed over 70 texts & training
> videos on the
> motion picture filmmaking industry) , which is the truth, you
> will find my
> reply to Mr. King. as a professional was polite.
> The Milkovitch case which Justice Stevens cited is one of two
> Amendment cases that belong to this list. It held that a
> newspaper does
> not immunize itself from a libel action simply by couching its
> accusations as
> "opinion." Chief Justice Rehnquist observed:
> Since the latter half of the 16th century, the
> common law
> has afforded a cause of action for damage to
> a person's
> reputation by the publication of false and
> In Shakespeare's Othello, Iago says to
> Good name in man and woman, dear my lord,
> Is the immediate jewel of their souls.
> Who steals my purse steals trash;
> 'Tis something, nothing;
> 'Twas mine, 'tis his, and has been slave to
> But he that filches from me my good name
> Robs me of that which not enriches him,
> And makes me poor indeed.
> I took on two law firms at once, alone, in that instance. My
> level is notorious, around the world, from Nato to the U.N.. Only
> allowed me to accomplish what no other person in the history of
> country had done to that time. It has hardly diminished.
> Your reply did not aid communications or clarification of
> the issue.
> Please take caution in the future.
> Pamela Jean Curry
> If I were a physician, I would suggest that you take a
> Prozac and then try to rewrite that message. Maybe
> a tranquilizer too!
> Pamelajeancurry wrote:
> To G. King:
> I personally like 35mm over medium format. But even when I was
> using a 35mm, my intention was to make moving film so I used the 35mm
> often as possible like a moving camera, and not just using the motor
> drive for the Canon F1. Here is where the cat/dog analogy somewhat
> fails. Some of
> the special effects, for example in The Matrix - where the camera makes
> a 360 degree turn around Mr. Reeves - were done with a series of
> still cameras.
> Medium format also does not go well with my Type A personality,
> the rough expression in journalism is F8 &Fu__ __ ! That whole
> backwards focasing thing is not for me. So you people must have a
> deal of patience. I have a cousin who is a professional, with a
> Studio that type of patience and limitations are for a different type
> personality. But also, yes ever since I've been reading Daniel
> book on Cinematography anything that can't work like a moving camera
> isn't of interest to me.
> I do like to test the quality of different types of lenses.
> If anyone else has any experience with Zeiss, I would appreciate their
> TrueBadger writes:
> Let me get this one straight. You hate your Rollei because it isn't
> a cinema camera? I understand perfectly. I have a friend who has
> hated his
> cat because it's the wrong kind of dog.
> G. King
End of Rollei Users list digest V12 #86