[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Rollei] Lawsuit from Curiosity: off topic Zeiss lens, Arri
- Subject: Re: [Rollei] Lawsuit from Curiosity: off topic Zeiss lens, Arri
- From: Pamelajeancurry
- Date: Sat, 17 May 2003 16:58:00 EDT
- References:
- --part1_1ec.90b0132.2bf7fc58_boundary
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Jerry,
You understand there are limitations under U.S. Law on how far
"opinion" can be expressed before if becomes defamatory. If you were
a "physician", I would take you to the ethics committee of the AMA, or
worse. The public citizen link to one of many articles on Medical
Malpractice,
about New York's most dangerous and undisciplined doctors.
http://www.publiccitizen.org/congress/civjus/medmal/articles.cfm?ID=9146
If anyone has read my lawsuit against the N.Y. Times or the contents
of my website (where I've reviewed over 70 texts & training videos on
the
motion picture filmmaking industry) , which is the truth, you will find
my
reply to Mr. King. as a professional was polite.
The Milkovitch case which Justice Stevens cited is one of two First
Amendment cases that belong to this list. It held that a newspaper does
not immunize itself from a libel action simply by couching its
accusations as
"opinion." Chief Justice Rehnquist observed:
Since the latter half of the 16th century, the common
law
has afforded a cause of action for damage to a
person's
reputation by the publication of false and
defamatory
statements.
In Shakespeare's Othello, Iago says to Othello:
Good name in man and woman, dear my lord,
Is the immediate jewel of their souls.
Who steals my purse steals trash;
'Tis something, nothing;
'Twas mine, 'tis his, and has been slave to
thousands;
But he that filches from me my good name
Robs me of that which not enriches him,
And makes me poor indeed.
I took on two law firms at once, alone, in that instance. My energy
level is notorious, around the world, from Nato to the U.N.. Only that
allowed me to accomplish what no other person in the history of this
country had done to that time. It has hardly diminished.
Your reply did not aid communications or clarification of the
issue.
Please take caution in the future.
Pamela
Jean Curry
> Pam
>
> If I were a physician, I would suggest that you take a
> Prozac and then try to rewrite that message. Maybe
> a tranquilizer too!
>
> Jerry
>
> Pamelajeancurry wrote:
>
> To G. King:
>
> I personally like 35mm over medium format. But even when I was
> using a 35mm, my intention was to make moving film so I used the 35mm as
> often as possible like a moving camera, and not just using the motor
> drive for the Canon F1. Here is where the cat/dog analogy somewhat fails.
> Some of
> the special effects, for example in The Matrix - where the camera makes
> a 360 degree turn around Mr. Reeves - were done with a series of
> still cameras.
> Medium format also does not go well with my Type A personality,
> the rough expression in journalism is F8 &Fu__ __ ! That whole
> backwards focasing thing is not for me. So you people must have a great
> deal of patience. I have a cousin who is a professional, with a Portrait
> Studio that type of patience and limitations are for a different type of
> personality. But also, yes ever since I've been reading Daniel Arajon's
> book on Cinematography anything that can't work like a moving camera
> isn't of interest to me.
> I do like to test the quality of different types of lenses.
> If anyone else has any experience with Zeiss, I would appreciate their
> input.
>
>
> TrueBadger writes:
> Let me get this one straight. You hate your Rollei because it isn't
> a cinema camera? I understand perfectly. I have a friend who has always
hated his > cat because it's the wrong kind of dog.
> G. King
>
- --part1_1ec.90b0132.2bf7fc58_boundary
Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<HTML><FONT FACE=3Darial,helvetica><FONT SIZE=3D2 FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" FACE=
=3D"Arial" LANG=3D"0"> Jerry,<BR>
<BR>
You understand there are limitati=
ons under U.S. Law on how far<BR>
"opinion" can be expressed before if becomes defamatory.=20=
If you were<BR>
a "physician", I would take you to the ethics committee o=
f the AMA, or <BR>
worse. The public citizen link to one of many articles on=
Medical Malpractice,<BR>
about New York's most dangerous and undisciplined doctors=
. <BR>
<BR>
http://www.publiccitizen.org/congress/civjus/medmal/artic=
les.cfm?ID=3D9146<BR>
<BR>
If anyone has read my lawsu=
it against the N.Y. Times or the contents<BR>
of my website (where I've reviewed over 70 texts &a=
mp; training videos on the<BR>
motion picture filmmaking industry) , which is the=20=
truth, you will find my <BR>
reply to Mr. King. as a professional was polite.&nb=
sp; <BR>
<BR>
The Milkovitch case which J=
ustice Stevens cited is one of two First<BR>
Amendment cases that belong to this list. It=20=
held that a newspaper does<BR>
not immunize itself from a libel action simpl=
y by couching its accusations as<BR>
"opinion." Chief Justice Rehnquist obse=
rved: <BR>
&nbs=
p; Since the lat=
ter half of the 16th century, the common law<BR>
&nbs=
p; has aff=
orded a cause of action for damage to a person's<BR>
&nbs=
p; reputat=
ion by the publication of false and defamatory<BR>
&nbs=
p; stateme=
nts. <BR>
<BR>
&nbs=
p; In Shak=
espeare's Othello, Iago says to Othello: <BR>
&nbs=
p; Good na=
me in man and woman, dear my lord, <BR>
&nbs=
p; Is the=20=
immediate jewel of their souls. <BR>
&nbs=
p; Who ste=
als my purse steals trash; <BR>
&nbs=
p; 'Tis so=
mething, nothing; <BR>
&nbs=
p; 'Twas m=
ine, 'tis his, and has been slave to thousands; <BR>
&nbs=
p; But he=20=
that filches from me my good name <BR>
&nbs=
p; Robs me=
of that which not enriches him, <BR>
&nbs=
p; And mak=
es me poor indeed.<BR>
<BR>
I took on two law firms at=20=
once, alone, in that instance. My energy<BR>
level is notorious, around the world, from Nato to=20=
the U.N.. Only that<BR>
allowed me to accomplish what no other person in th=
e history of this<BR>
country had done to that time. It has hardly dimini=
shed. <BR>
&nbs=
p; &n=
bsp; <BR>
Your reply did not ai=
d communications or clarification of the issue.<BR>
Please take caution in the future.  =
; &nb=
sp; <BR>
&nbs=
p; &n=
bsp; =
&nbs=
p; &n=
bsp; Pamela Jean Curry<BR>
<BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=3DCITE style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT=
: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px"> Pam<BR>
<BR>
If I were a physician, I would suggest that you take a<BR>
Prozac and then try to rewrite that message. Maybe<BR>
a tranquilizer too!<BR>
<BR>
Jerry<BR>
<BR>
Pamelajeancurry wrote:<BR>
<BR>
To G. King:<BR>
<BR>
I personally like 35mm over medium format. But even when I was<=
BR>
using a 35mm, my intention was to make moving film so I used the 35mm as<BR>
often as possible like a moving camera, and not just using the motor</BLOCKQ=
UOTE></FONT><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZ=
E=3D2 FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" FACE=3D"Arial" LANG=3D"0"><BR>
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=3DCITE style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT=
: 5px; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px"></FONT><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000"=
style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" SIZE=3D2 FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" FACE=3D"A=
rial" LANG=3D"0">drive for the Canon F1. Here is where the cat/dog analogy s=
omewhat fails. Some of<BR>
the special effects, for example in The Matrix - where the camera makes<BR>
a 360 degree turn around Mr. Reeves - were done with a series of<BR>
still cameras.<BR>
Medium format also does not go well with my Type A person=
ality,<BR>
the rough expression in journalism is F8 &Fu__ __ ! That whole<BR>
backwards focasing thing is not for me. So you people must have a grea=
t<BR>
deal of patience. I have a cousin who is a professional, with a Portrait<BR>
Studio that type of patience and limitations are for a different type of<BR>
personality. But also, yes ever since I've been reading Daniel A=
rajon's<BR>
book on Cinematography anything that can't work like a moving camera<BR>
isn't of interest to me.<BR>
I do like to test the quality of different ty=
pes of lenses.<BR>
If anyone else has any experience with Zeiss, I would appreciate their input=
.<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
TrueBadger writes:<BR>
Let me get this one straight. You hate your Rollei because it isn't<BR=
>
a cinema camera? I understand perfectly. I have a friend who has alway=
s</BLOCKQUOTE></FONT><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ff=
ffff" SIZE=3D2 FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" FACE=3D"Arial" LANG=3D"0"><BR>
</FONT><FONT COLOR=3D"#000000" style=3D"BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffff=
ff" SIZE=3D2 FAMILY=3D"SANSSERIF" FACE=3D"Arial" LANG=3D"0"> hated his <BLOC=
KQUOTE TYPE=3DCITE style=3D"BORDER-LEFT: #0000ff 2px solid; MARGIN-LEFT: 5px=
; MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px; PADDING-LEFT: 5px">cat because it's the wrong kind of d=
og.<BR>
G. King<BR>
</BLOCKQUOTE><BR>
<BR>
</FONT></HTML>
- --part1_1ec.90b0132.2bf7fc58_boundary--
------------------------------