[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Rollei] Ansel Adams (was film is digital)
- Subject: Re: [Rollei] Ansel Adams (was film is digital)
- From: Mark Rabiner <mark >
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 21:55:42 -0700
- References: <735720C0A5C5A444A7E3268DA6F17D5C41543C >
"Fox, Robert" wrote:
> I used the term "pretty" because that's the word used by 99% of the public. I know that using that word is a kind of put-down if you know anything about quality photography. It's not my term, I just wanted to illustrate the common perception heard.
His work is criticized for being overly dramatic grandiose changes in
There is nothing pretty about it the bulk of Adam's work. I cant think
of a "pretty" shot.
I don't think black and white photography lends itself well to making
I think you need color for that. You'll get lots of "pretty".
Portland, Oregon USA