RE: [Rollei] Re: Rollei panorama head, and "nodal points"

[Carlos Manuel Freaza <cmfreaza]

Thank you very much,Siu, for your words.You are right,
I only wanted show a picture created by joining
several photographs.
You know that I  look your photographs in the Rollei
Gallery, they are excellent.
Best regards
Carlos 
 
- --- Siu Fai <siufai   escribió: > > BTW, the
?bug? is a depth of field matter. You can
> see
> > in my photograph first plane, medium plane and
> last
> > plane. The railing is the subject closer to the
> > camera, and it is slightly out of focus. If you
> look
> > paying attention, also the first metal bar?s
> railing
> > and its square are slightly out of focus, but
> itsn?t
> > so evident.. I always take the panoramic views
> with
> > the Rolleiflex at f/22, but in this case I used
> f/16
> > to obtain more details in the last plane where the
> > downtown is. The Xenotar 2.8 has its best
> performance
> > at f/16. If I used f/22 the ?bug? don?t exist, you
> can
> > be sure, but if you look the image 80 cm x 20cm
> from
> > the suitable distance, this railing slightly out
> of
> > focus isn?t evident and also you can see the
> downtown,
> > the river and the International bridge with
> details.
> 
> Don't get me wrong, you have done an excellent job
> and I'm impressed by your
> craftsmanship. The point I was trying to make is
> that you can actually see
> that the picture is created by joining several
> photographs and not a
> seamless panorama shot. If that is what you want,
> than it is fine. I prefer
> seamless panos that is taken with a real panorama
> camera, or stitched
> digitally with panorama software.
> 
> The ?bug? is not the DOF but the kinks in the
> railing. It reveals that it?s
> not a seamless pano.
> 
> Siu Fai
>  

- ------------
Internet GRATIS es Yahoo! Conexión
4004-1010 desde Buenos Aires. Usuario: yahoo; contraseña: yahoo
Más ciudades: http://conexion.yahoo.com.ar

------------------------------