Re: [Rollei] Why the 6-element lens for 3.5Fs

["Q.G. de Bakker" <qnu]

Q.G. de Bakker wrote:

> That's true. Indeed a compelling argument against the

Must have been distracted. ;-)

Please let me continue:

"against the too-busy-getting
their-act-together-again-to-pay-sufficient-and-constant-attention-to-quality
argument."

Though one could perhaps argue that these superb quality early post-war
period Zeiss products got a tiny bit extra care, being the things that Zeiss
hoped would rekindle the Zeiss flame in their customers hearts?
While those "old hat" Tessars were turned out en-masse, to keep the Zeiss
hearth burning?

------------------------------