[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Rollei] Why the 6-element lens for 3.5Fs
- Subject: Re: [Rollei] Why the 6-element lens for 3.5Fs
- From: David Seifert <dseifert >
- Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 11:52:15 -0700
- References: <5C7752CCB00C3A47A70D5C4204A360B2554A55 >
Legal process is what allowed them to drop the Opton prefix. A western
court's judgement that declared the Oberkochen company as the legal owner
of the Carl Zeiss trademark in the non-Warsaw Pact countries removed the
need for the Opton nomenclature. Nothing else.
At 08:29 PM 5/2/2003 +0200, you wrote:
>It was not suggested that the lower level QC/larger quality spread had
>anything to do with changing assembly line, or control meassures.
>Maybe a "fresh wind" blowing through the Oberkochen company, responsible for
>the boost in convidence that made them drop the "Opton" prefix and claim to
>be The One And Only "Zeiss" (no more, no less), also affected how people "on
>the line" approached their daily tasks?
>Anyway, in the case of Tessars made for Hasselblad, the change from
>"Zeiss-Opton" to "Zeiss" Tessar was accompanied with a change in mount. Do
>you know if that is the only difference?