[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Rollei] Why the 6-element lens for 3.5Fs
- Subject: RE: [Rollei] Why the 6-element lens for 3.5Fs
- From: "Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)" <peterk >
- Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 05:55:27 -0700
- References:
Jerry, there go my virgin eyes....no more caffeine for you late in the
day. :-)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jerry Lehrer [mailto:jerryleh ]
> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 7:49 PM
> To: rollei us
> Subject: Re: [Rollei] Why the 6-element lens for 3.5Fs
>
>
> Richard
>
> I say it again! In 1952, I saw a H'blad Ektar apart at Oscar
> Heinemann's
> shop. It was FIVE (5) elements. OH said that it looked just like a
> Medalist lens. Maybe the first Ektars were 4 element Tessars, but
> the later ones were not. There is no need to count F**$^@g
> reflections
> when the lens is apart and you can see the cemented surfaces.
>
> I can supply no more than my eyewitness report.
>
> End of discussion!
>
> Jerry
>
> Richard Knoppow wrote:
>
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter)" <peterk >
> > To: <rollei
> > Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 2:39 PM
> > Subject: RE: [Rollei] Why the 6-element lens for 3.5Fs
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > Was the Tessar for the 'blad any good? Better than the
> > Ektar lenses they
> > > were using?
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: todd [mailto:todd_belcher ]
> > > Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2003 2:22 PM
> > > To: rollei us
> > > Subject: Re: [Rollei] Why the 6-element lens for 3.5Fs
> > >
> > >
> > > Richard, I think QG has the 2.8 Tessar in an early
> > Hasselblad mount and
> > > does not mean the 2.8 Tessar as found in the Rollei TLR.
> > >
> > > todd
> > >
> > That would be interesting. AFAIK, the Hasselblad Ektars
> > were Heliar type lenses of the type designed by Fred Altman
> > and covered under USP 2,279,384. Altman states that he used
> > the extra element to obtain better control of rim rays,
> > which is what is needed when making a fast lens.
> > Other examples of this lens are all f/3.5 however.
> > It would be of considerable interest to me to know for
> > certain what the construction is. Someone who has one could
> > count the reflections and tell whether it is a Heliar or
> > something else.
> > ---
> > Richard Knoppow
> > Los Angeles, CA, USA
> > dickburk
>
>
------------------------------