[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Rollei] Why the 6-element lens for 3.5Fs
- Subject: Re: [Rollei] Why the 6-element lens for 3.5Fs
- From: "Q.G. de Bakker" <qnu
- Date: Fri, 2 May 2003 00:39:54 +0200
- References: <5C7752CCB00C3A47A70D5C4204A360B2554A55 >
Kotsinadelis, Peter (Peter) wrote:
> Was the Tessar for the 'blad any good? Better than the Ektar lenses they
> were using?
I was asking the very same question on the HUG, to find out if it would
"pay" cleaning the Zeiss-Opton Tessars, or if i would be better of using my
One answer i received there so far said that there is no difference between
In a conversation off-list i was told that the early (1951-1953)
"Zeiss-Opton Tessars", contrary to later (post October 1953) "Zeiss
Tessars", had very poor QC and quite inconsistent quality. They could be
quite good. They could be quite bad.