[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Rollei] differences between Rollei-produced 80/2.8planar and Zeiss-prod...



Beflockung mit mattschwarzen Fusseln

Dirk-Roger Schmitt schrieb:

> At 00:44 28.06.00 -0700, you wrote:
> >Don't the new 80/2.8 PQS planars w/ the black Bay VI mounts have the new
> >internal flocking
>
> What do you mean with flocking?   Dirk
>
> >like the 110/2 planar ? (this is confirmed to have the latest
> >Zeiss flocking by Kornelius) . I got my second 6008i in 1998 w/ the chrome bay
> >VI 80/2.8 PQ planar. The rep. at that time said the 80/2.8 PQ's were being
> >updated w/ a black Bay VI ring instead of the chrome-plated brass, so I wonder
> >if the flocking was the same. The 50/4 distagon has been updated to the  50/4
> >FLE version while, I believe, the EL series of 50/4, 80/2.8, 150/4 are all the
> >original models w/ more composite construction.
> >
> >--Jim
> >
> > > Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 09:58:56 -0400
> > > From: "Bob Shell" <bob  >
> > > Subject: Re: [Rollei] differences between Rollei-produced 80/2.8 planar and
> >Zeiss-prod...
> > > Message-ID: <200006271358.JAA20482  >
> > > References:
> > >
> > > I don't think the 50, 80 and 150 have been updated at all.  I think
> > > this is also
> > > true for the 250.
> > >
> > > Bob
> > >

------------------------------