[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Rollei] Rolleiflex T Reprise: from the archives!
- Subject: Re: [Rollei] Rolleiflex T Reprise: from the archives!
- From: todd <todd_belcher
- Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 18:39:43 -0700
- --------------22F98F7D715125BD3322183D
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; x-mac-type="54455854"; x-mac-creator="4D4F5353"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
The basic T did not come with a lightmeter, though the camera was fitted
to take the T lightmeter as used on the 2.8 and 3.5 E and F 'Flexes, and
many of them have been so equipped.
The T uses the same light meter as on the E, E2, E3, Tele and Wide, but a
different light meter than the F models.
The camera was equipped with the
removable hood similar to that on the 2.8 E (2).
Similar but not the same. The T camera lacked the reflex mirror in the
waist level finder that the E seris and F models had.
Todd
- --------------22F98F7D715125BD3322183D
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
<!doctype html public "-//w3c//dtd html 4.0 transitional//en">
<html>
<i> The basic T did not come with a lightmeter, though the camera
was fitted</i>
<br><i>to take the T lightmeter as used on the 2.8 and 3.5 E and F 'Flexes,
and</i>
<br><i>many of them have been so equipped.</i><i></i>
<p>The T uses the same light meter as on the E, E2, E3, Tele and Wide,
but a different light meter than the F models.<i></i>
<p><i>The camera was equipped with the</i>
<br><i>removable hood similar to that on the 2.8 E (2).</i><i></i>
<p>Similar but not the same. The T camera lacked the reflex mirror in the
waist level finder that the E seris and F models had.
<p>Todd</html>
- --------------22F98F7D715125BD3322183D--
------------------------------